Gray Literature
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in the gray literature do not necessarily reflect the views of the IMPROVE Steering Committee or the agencies that support IMPROVE.
Title/Document/Author
Date
Doc #Data Validation Historical Report NO3Expand
Authors:
Linsey DeBell
Historical (from 2006) QA report related to nitrate measurements.
Low wintertime nitrate concentrations observed at some sites from 1996-97 to 1999-2000 (anomaly 1 below) may have resulted from measurement abnormalities during that period. However, there is no definitive evidence to support that claim, and thus the data must be considered valid until shown otherwise.A History of the A&WMA Visibility Specialty ConferencesExpand
Authors:
Delbert J. Eatough, Bret A. Schichtel, William C. Malm, Marc Pitchford, Peter K. Muller, Tracy Fedkoe
The enactment of the Clean Air Act of 1970 (1970 CAA) and the creation of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the same year resulted in a major shift in the federal government air quality programs (https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/evolution-clean-air-act). Congress recognized that visibility is a resource to be valued and preserved and in the 1977 CAA amendments set forth a national goal that called for “the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I federal areas which impairment results from manmade air pollution.” Class I areas are the 156 national parks and wilderness areas where visibility was deemed an important attribute. In addition, the CAA amendments established the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) rule, with the intent of preserving the air quality in Class I areas, and in 1999 the Regional Haze Rule (RHR) was created with the goal of reducing haze on the most-impaired days to natural conditions. The 1990 CAA amendments were designed to curb four major threats to both the environment and human health, which indirectly helped to improved visibility. The mandate to reduce the threat of acid rain resulted in significant reductions in SO2 emissions from oil- and coal-fired power plants and subsequently a reduction in haze-causing particulate sulfate. To aid in the implementation of the visibility goals and PSD rule, the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program was established in 1985 and began speciated aerosol sampling in 1988; the program was significantly expanded beginning in 2000 to support the RHR. In response to the 1977 CAA amendments, the Air Pollution Control Association (now the Air & Waste Management Association—A&WMA) held its first visibility specialty conference in Denver, Colorado, in 1980. These conferences have been repeated since then about every three or four years. The relationships among the growth of the IMPROVE monitoring program, the development of the science, the introduction of the PSD rule, the introduction of the RHR, and these conferences are the subjects of this manuscript.
AppendicesAppendix A. 1979 Denver conference topics and keynote address
Appendix B. 1980 Grand Canyon conference topics and abstracts
Appendix C. 1986 Grand Teton Conference program and introductory remarks
Appendix D. 1989 Estes Park conference program and introductory remarks
Appendix E. 1994 Snowbird conference program and proceeding’s preface
Appendix F. 1997 Bartlett conference program and proceeding’s preface
Appendix G. 2001 Bend conference preface and program
Appendix H. 2004 Ashville conference program
Appendix I. 2008 Moab conference program and abstracts
Appendix J. 2012 Whitefish conference program and abstracts
Appendix K. 2010 Jackson Hole conference program and abstracts
Appendix L. 2021 Bryce Canyon conference program and abstracts Flow Rate Validation Memo 2005ExpandAuthors: Nicole Hyslop
Document
2005 Memo describing plans to revise and standardize the flowrate validation criteria. The change to validation criteria was the first step to standardize and objectify the validation process. The plan was consistent with the overall UC Davis plan to focus more of the validation efforts on the raw data instead of the agglomerated concentration data. The new criteria are based on calculation limitations, performance testing, and cutpoint accuracy considerations.
Additional details available beginning on slide 37 of this Steering Committee Meeting presentation.The Future of Carbonaceous Aerosol Measurement in the IMPROVE Monitoring ProgramExpandAuthors: Bret Schichtel, William Malm, Melinda Beaver, Scott Copeland, Jenny Hand, Anthony Prenni, Joann Rice, John Vimont
Document
Carbonaceous aerosols are a signification fraction of fine particulate matter, often accounting for more than 50% of the mass in urban and rural environments. In the Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) program, thermal optical reflectance (TOR) is used to determine the total carbon (TC) concentration, separated into organic carbon (OC) and light absorbing carbon (LAC) fractions. TOR is an operationally defined analysis that cannot be referenced to traceable standards that reflect ambient compositions, so it is challenging to prevent potential instrument drift over long periods. The OC-LAC split can depend on the aerosol composition, which has spatial and long-term trends. These issues can introduce patterns and trends in the data records, complicating assessments of the spatial and temporal patterns of carbonaceous aerosols. In addition, TOR analysis is relatively expensive, and recent decreases in ambient concentrations are challenging the TOR detection limits, particularly for LAC. Due to these issues, two alternative carbonaceous measurements are being explored to supplement or replace TOR analysis in the IMPROVE network. The first is the use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), where FTIR spectra are calibrated against a subset of the measured TOR OC and LAC data. The second is a system using TC derived from a thermal method and filter absorption (fabs) measured using a hybrid integrating plate and sphere (HIPS) system. Estimates of LAC are then derived from the fabs data, and OC is estimated from the difference between TC and LAC. These methods have different benefits and drawbacks. FTIR is cost effective, but being calibrated to TOR, has the same inherent problems as an operationally defined method. TC and fabs measurements are also cost effective and known to produce stable long-term trends. However, fabs is subject to filter loading artifacts and relating TC and fabs to TOR OC and LAC is challenging. These three carbonaceous measurement methods are reviewed and contrasted with final recommendations for monitoring in the IMPROVE network.Identifying and classifying change in PTFE material within a manufacturer’s lot of IMPROVE filters ExpandAuthor: Ann M. Dillner, Jason Giacomo and Bruno Debus
Document
IMPROVE blank filters collected in October 2019 produced anomalous results in HIPS suggesting a change in PTFE filter material in the middle of manufacturer’s lot. These filters have a non-uniform appearance and also appeared shiny under careful visual inspection indicating a change in spectral reflectance. With the exception of blanks, separating uniform and non-uniform filters in the October data could not be achieved using HIPS. FTIR analysis, on the other hand, successfully identified both blanks and sampled filters as either uniform or non-uniform. The filter classification derived from the FTIR study enabled each filter to be assigned to the correct HIPS calibration such that no sample data was lost. FTIR calibrations were similarly built using the FTIR-derived filter classification to provide FTIR OC and EC data.Summary of Reprocessing 2016 IMPROVE Carbon Data with New Integration ThresholdExpand
Author: Xiaoliang Wang
Document
Since January 2016, carbon analysis of the IMPROVE and Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) were completed with the DRI Model 2015 multiwavelength carbon analyzers, while the DRI Model 2001 carbon analyzers were used in earlier years. There are two main design differences between Model 2001 and Model 2015: 1) Model 2001 uses a single laser (633 nm) while Model 2015 uses seven lasers (i.e., 405, 445, 532, 635, 780, 808, and 980 nm) for optical monitoring; and 2) Model 2001 uses a flame ionization detector (FID) for carbon detection, while the Model 2015 uses a nondispersive infrared (NDIR) CO2 detector. The carbon integration signal for the Model 2015 is calculated as the product of the CO2 concentration (ppm) and NDIR flow rate (200 mL/min). This report:
- Re-examines the IMPROVE comparison data between Model 2015 and Model 2001
- Evaluates the Model 2015 signal integration threshold in relation to the Model 2001 threshold;
- Compares 2016 IMPROVE data with different Model 2015 signal integration thresholds.
Optec NGN-2 LED Ambient Integrating NephelometerExpand
Author: John Molenar,
Document
The Optec NGN-2 ambient integrating nephelometer was designed to operate in low power, low maintenance, ambient conditions, and to minimally heat the ambient aerosol. However, in earlier versions of the instrument, the use of an incandescent light source resulted in a slight heating of the the ambient aerosol of approximately 1-2 oC. At high ambient relative humidities (>80%), an increase in temperature in the chamber as small as 1 oC will result in a 8-10% lowering of the relative humidity in the chamber. As a result, under certain conditions the aerosol scattering measured by the nephelometer can be nearly 100% less than the actual ambient scattering. In addition the use of an incandescent light requires a mechanical chopping system to modulate the light source and the light source has a short life span. Because of these factors, a high output LED light source was incorporated into the NGN-2. The light source has a life span of thousands of hours, emits essentially no heat, and is electronically modulated which allows the removal of the mechanical chopper.Ancillary Uses of IMPROVE Monitoring Data – Potentially Affected by Funding ReductionsExpand
Author: Rich Poirot,
Document
The primary objective of IMPROVE monitoring is to support implementation of the 1999 EPA Regional Haze Rule. However, thanks to the the long-term operation of the IMPROVE network (since 1988), consistent measurements of multiple species at multiple, regionally representative sites, high level of data quality, and active involvement of federal and state agencies and the academic community, many “ancillary benefits” have also been realized. This document, written in 2012, summarizes many of these ancillary benefits and includes a comprehensive list of publications (through 2012) that have used IMPROVE data. The multitude of data uses would all potentially be affected by reductions in funding.An Assessment of Wildfire Smoke in Western U.S. National Parks Using IMPROVE Monitoring DataExpand
Author: Keith A. Rose,
Document
This study used Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF), a multivariate factor analysis tool that decomposes a matrix of speciated sample data into a factor contributions matrix and a factor profiles matrix, to identify wildfire smoke contributions to PM2.5 mass measured at IMPROVE monitors in six western U.S national parks. PMF was used to identify smoke contributions over two 5-year time periods separated by approximately 20 years. These results were then used to determine if there has been a significant change in wildfire smoke contributions at each site between the two time periods.Recommendation of the IMPROVE/CSN Organic Carbon Artifact Adjustment CommitteeExpand
Authors: Dillner et al,
Document
This presentation reviews the current (as of 2013) methods used to correct for the positive organic carbon artifact in the IMPROVE and CSN programs; analyzes the measured carbon artifacts on backup and field blank filters and makes recommendations on how best to correct of the positive organic artifacts and harmonize the procedures in the IMPROVE and CSN programs.A Statistical Simulation Study to Evaluate the Sensitivity of Deciview Calculations to Missing Data Values and Relative Humidity FactorsExpand
Authors: Patterson, Hess and Iyer
Document
This report examines the sensitivity of estimated dv values to the choice of a strategy for handling missing values. The report also examines, via statistical simulation studies, the closeness of the estimated dv values to the “true values” under different scenarios for the occurrences of missing values. It is found that, when missing values occur infrequently, there doesn’t appear to be a practical difference in the estimated dv regardless of the method used. However, as the frequency of occurrence of missing values increases, differences due to estimation method becomes noticeable.Summary of Urban Visibility Workshop and PresentationsExpand
Authors: Deck, et al.,
Document
On October 6-8, 2008, the U.S. EPA’s Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) held an expert workshop on urban visibility preferences and valuation to identify and discuss methods and materials that could be used in “next step” projects to develop additional information about people’s preferences for reducing existing impairment of urban visibility, and about the value of improving urban visibility. This document summarizes findings from this workshop and contains some of the presentations.Regional Haze Rule Natural Level Estimates Using the Revised IMPROVE Aerosol Reconstructed Light Extinction AlgorithmExpand
Authors: Copeland et al.,
Document
An extended abstract describing the method and results for calculating the natural haze levels using the revised IMPROVE aerosol reconstructed light extinction algorithm and a revised natural haze level algorithm. This was presented at the AWMA Aerosol & Atmospheric Optics: Visual Air Quality and Radiation specialty conference at Moab, Utah, April 2008.Inside the Navajo Generating StationExpand
Authors: Schichtel et al.,
Document
In September 2007, several member of the IMPROVE steering committee and others were given a tour of the Navajo Generating Station (NGS), a coal fired power plant producing 2250 megawatts of electricity. The tour included the wet scrubbers which were installed in the 1990s to reduce the emissions of the SO2 and other pollutants. Following is a brochure provided to the participants which shows a schematic of NGS and the flow of material to generate the electricity.Proposed FLAG Level II AND III Visibility AssessmentExpand
Authors: Schichtel et al.,
Document
This manuscript outlines and demonstrates a set of procedures that could be used in a detailed FLAG level II and III visibility assessment. The procedure uses advanced visibility modeling to simulate the instantaneous degradation of visual air quality indexes along idealized sight paths under various ambient lighting conditions. This work was presented at the AWMA Specialty Conference – Guideline on Air Quality Models: Applications and FLAG Developments, Denver, CO, 2006.Natural Haze Levels II: Application of the New IMPROVE Algorithm to Natural Species Concentrations EstimatesExpand
Authors: Natural Haze Levels II Committee
Document
The Natural Haze Levels II Committee was established in the Spring of 2006 to review and refine, as appropriate, a methodology developed by Roger Ames (CIRA) for applying the new IMPROVE algorithm for estimating light extinction from aerosol species concentrations to natural species concentration estimates. The ultimate purpose of this committee was to determine natural haze estimates for the 20% best and 20% worst day for each of the visibility-protected class I areas. This is the final report of the committee describing the procedures and final results for each of the visibility protected area.Behavior of Fine-Particle Elemental Data Near the Detection LimitExpand
Authors: White, W., UC Davis
Document
The elemental composition of particulate matter collected on several IMPROVE filters was examined by analyzing the filters hundreds of times using the non-destructive XRF analysis. The hundreds of results allowed the estimation of the distributions of potential analytical outcomes which were examined using counting statistics. Poster: XRFposter.pptUsing In-Network Precision Data as a Basis for Cross-Network ComparisonsExpand
Authors: White, W., UC Davis
Document
A presentation comparing data from collocated IMPROVE and STN monitors. This presented at the AAAR Specialty Conference in Atlanta, GA, February 2005A SAS Macro for Theil RegressionExpand
Authors: Ann Hess – Colorado State University
Document
In straight-line regression, the least squares estimator of the slope is sensitive to outliers and the associated confidence interval is affected by non-normality of the dependent variable. A simple and robust alternative to least squares regression is Theil regression, first proposed by H. Theil (1950). Theil’s method actually yields an estimate of the slope of the regression line. Several approaches exist for obtaining a nonparametric estimate of the intercept. In this paper, we describe a SAS macro for implementing Theil regression where the estimation of the intercept is based on Graybill and Iyer (1994).Summary of IMPROVE Nitrate MeasurementsExpand
Authors: McDade C. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
In November 2002 a number of questions arose regarding the accuracy of data obtained from the IMPROVE B Module, especially for nitrate. In particular, wintertime nitrate concentrations at many sites were below historical levels for about four years, from 1996-97 to 1999-2000. This paper reports on a number of sampler tests conducted to investigate these questions.Artifact Corrections in IMPROVEExpand
Authors: McDade C. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
IMPROVE adjusts for positive sampling artifacts by subtracting nylon filter field blank values and quartz after filter values from measured ion and carbon concentrations, respectively. Artifacts have been observed to vary substantially among filter manufacturing lots, especially for nylon filters. Sulfate and nitrate artifact corrections are currently less than 10% of the measured values, but organic carbon artifacts can exceed 50% of the measured values.Evaluation of the Equation for Soil CompositeExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
The purpose of this report is to determine if we wish to revise the current equation for the soil composite. This report examines four aspects of the soil equation. The first is what to do when aluminum is missed because of x-ray interference. The second is how to treat soil potassium. The third is how to treat soil elements not included in the equation. The fourth is a suggested change in the equation for the uncertainty in the soil composite concentrations.Rocky Mountain Atmospheric Nitrogen and Sulfur Study (ROMANS) brochureExpand
An NPS brochure describing the Rocky Mountain Atmospheric Nitrogen and Sulfur Study (ROMANS) study including the problem of increasing nitrogen deposition and its effects on the ecosystem, the measurement campaign conducted as part of ROMANS and the study objectives.Re-Submittal of IMPROVE Transmissometer Extinction Data (1986 – 2004)Expand
Authors: Air Resource Specialist (ARS)
Document
In August, 2006, ARS performed additional QA on the IMPROVE Optec LPV-2 transmissometer data set in preparation for re-submittal to CIRA. The goals of this additional QA were as follows: 1) Check for completeness and continuity of data 2) Verify that reported RH and AT are within instrument specifications 3) Verify lamp and calibration information. QA checks prompted some changes in the raw (Level-A) files and in the transmissometer lamp files. ARS reprocessed all historical transmissometer data to include these changes. A total of 1151 files were reprocessed for the years 1987–2004 and are included on the accompanying CD.Simulation of the Impact of the SO2 Emissions from the Proposed Sithe Power Plant on the Grand Canyon and other Class I AreasExpand
Authors: Bret Schichtel, William Malm
Document
This report assess the potential impact of a proposed source in the Four Corners basin on haze on the Colorado Plateau. This is done by first examining past monitoring and modeling studies to determine the relevant atmospheric processes that would cause the source to have it largest contribution to haze. Then diagnostic modeling is conducted using a particle dispersion model to reproduce these processes to simulate the source contribution to sulfate concentrations at the Grand Canyon NP and other class I areas. Radiative transfer modeling is then conducted to simulate the impact of sulfate concentrations on the scene.Simulation of the potential impacts of the proposed Sithe power plant in the Four Corners basin using CAMxExpand
Authors: Michael Barna, Marco Rodriguez
Document
This study investigates the potential impacts of a proposed power plant located in the Four Corners basin on class I areas during January 2001 with the “Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions” (CAMx) photochemical dispersion model. The MM5 mesoscale model was used to generate 4 km horizontal resolution meteorological fields used as input for CAMx.Revised IMPROVE Algorithm for Estimating Light Extinction from Particle Speciation DataExpand
Authors: IMPROVE technical subcommittee for algorithm review
Document
The proposed new algorithm described in this report was adopted for use by the IMPROVE Steering Committee in December 2005.
This document is a summary report by a subcommittee established by the IMPROVE Steering Committee at their July 2005 meeting to recommend a refined algorithm that would replace or be made available as an alternative to the current approach. The subcommittee included those who worked on the internal review as well as scientists who have been critical of the original IMPROVE algorithm. The primary purpose of this document is to describe the subcommittee’s recommended revised algorithm, characterize its performance, and summarize the rationale for each of the changes from the currently used algorithm.Redelivery of IMPROVE Data, 2000-2004Expand
Authors: Charles McDade – UC Davis
Document
In October 2005 UC Davis resubmitted all of the IMPROVE aerosol data for the five year Regional Haze Rule (RHR) baseline period, 2000-2004. The data were resubmitted to correct several errors and discrepancies in the data in order to provide the RHR analysts with the best available data set. There were four systematic changes that affected large blocks of data and this document provides a summary of these changes.Source allocation and visibility impairment in two class I areas with positive matrix factorizationExpand
Authors: Keith Rose – US EPA
Document
ABSTRACT: In this study, a statistical method known as Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) was used to analyze IMPROVE monitoring data collected at two west coast Class I areas over two time periods, 1991-1995 and 2000-2003. These Class I areas were Mt. Rainier National Park in Washington, and Yosemite National Park in California. PMF generated source profiles associated with each source of fine particulates, and generated a time-dependent series of fine particulate concentrations from each source in these two Class I areas. The light extinction of each source was determined by summing the light extinction of all the light absorbing chemical species in each source. The average light extinction of each source for 1991-1995 and 2000-2003 were summed to determine the total light extinction in each Class I area for these time periods. The total light extinction in each Class I area in 2002 was also determined for the worst 20% visibility days, which is one of the parameters identified in EPA’s Regional Haze Rule to determine progress towards improving visibility in Class I areas. The composition of the biomass source in Yosemite was also examined to determine the relative contribution of fine particulates from biomass combustion and biogenic emissions to visibility impairment on the 20% worst visibility days in 2002. The results show that PMF can be used as a tool to help determine which sources have the most significant impact on visibility in Class I areas, and how the visibility impairment from each source varies over time.Review of the IMPROVE Equation for Estimating Ambient Light Extinction Coefficients – Final ReportExpand
Authors: J.L. Hand and W.C. Malm
Document **
The Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) protocols for reconstructing ambient light extinction from measured aerosol species is the basis for evaluating compliance under the Regional Haze Rule. We review the assumptions involved in computing reconstructed light extinction using the IMPROVE protocol. This review includes examining the biases in the measurements of aerosol composition, the assumed chemical forms of aerosol species, particle hygroscopicity, and assumed mass scattering efficiencies. We present a thorough survey of estimates of mass scattering efficiencies from recent peer-reviewed literature. Furthermore, we use IMPROVE nephelometry and composition data to estimate mass scattering efficiencies using a variety of methods. The current mass scattering efficiencies applied in the IMPROVE equation are then interpreted in the context of this survey and results derived from the IMPROVE data analyses. Finally, a summary of provisional recommendations for refinements to the IMPROVE equation and a discussion of important uncertainties to consider in the assumptions is presented. Although tentative recommendations of refinements to the IMPROVE equation are presented, final refinements to the IMPROVE equation await future discussions of the results presented here.Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of the Optec NGN NephelometerExpand
Authors: John Molenar – Air Resource Specialist
Document
The integrating nephelometer directly measures the scattering coefficient of atmospheric aerosols. The Optec NGN integrating nephelometer was designed to operate in low power, low maintenance, and ambient field conditions. This required two main compromises in the optical design:
- The use of a photodiode rather than a photomultiplier tube (PMT) detector, and
- A wide band filter to compensate for the reduced sensitivity of the photodiode compared to a PMT.
The following is a theoretical examination of the effect of these design requirements on the measurement accuracy of the Optec NGN integrating nephelometer and an experimental determination of the measurement precision of the instrument. Included in the theoretical analysis are comparisons to three other currently available integrating nephelometers:
- TSI 3563: TSI, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota
- Belfort 1590 : Belfort Instrument Company, Baltimore, Maryland
- Radiance Research M903: Radiance Research Inc., Seattle, Washington
Operational Assessment of the NGN-2 NephelometersExpand
Authors: Air Resource Specialist
Document
This report summarizes Air Resources Specialists’ (ARS) operational experience with the Optec Next Generation Nephelometer (NGN) from 1992 to 1994. It describes several design, manufacturing and operating deficiencies that were discovered and instrument upgrades to address these deficiencies.Theoretical Analysis of PM2.5 Mass Measurements by NephelometryExpand
Authors: John Molenar – Air Resource Specialist
Document
This paper uses Lorenz-Mie theory, reasonable estimates of the variation of ambient aerosol properties, and the optical characteristics of currently available nephelometers and light scattering photometers to investigate the theoretical limits of the accuracy and precision of PM2.5 mass measurements estimated by nephelometry.Comparison of the DRI/OGC and Model 2001 Thermal/Optical Carbon AnalyzersExpand
Authors: Chow et al., – Desert Research Institute
Document Also available as an MS word document
The DRI/OGC analyzers used for IMPROVE carbon analysis since 1987 are obsolete and spare parts for repairs are no longer manufactured and increasingly difficult to obtain. The Model 2001 carbon analyzer has been designed and tested as a replacement for future IMPROVE sample analysis. This report summarizes a number of analyses comparing the DRI/OGC and Model 2001 analyzers under different configurations. The similarities and differences are reported and recommendations are made for a smooth transition from the current DRI/OGC analyzer to the Model 2001. IMPROVE TOR Analysis for Carbon – Assessment of Transition to a New Analyzer – PresentationExpand
Authors: Mark Pitchford
Document Also available as a power point file
A power point presentation on the assessment of the comparability between the current DRI/OGC carbon analyzer used in IMPROVE and the new Model 2001 carbon analyzer proposed as the DRI/OGC replacement.Source Allocation of Columbia Gorge IMPROVE Data with Positive Matrix FactorizationExpand
Authors: Keith Rose – US EPA
Document
Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) was used to model IMPROVE monitoring data collected at the Mt. Zion and Wishram monitoring sites in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. PMF was able to identify source categories that contribute to the fine particulates (PM2.5) measured at each site, the average percent PM2.5 mass allocation from each source category, and the time-dependent allocation from each source category. PMF identified 9 source categories for the Mt. Zion site based on 1996-98 data, and, 9 source categories for the Wishram site based on 1993-95 data.Spatial and Seasonal Patterns in Speciated Fine Particle Concentrations in the Rural United StatesExpand
Authors: Bret Schichtel – National Park Service
Document also available as a power pt file (18 MB)
A presentation describing the IMPROVE particulate monitoring network and the spatial and seasonal patterns of the composite aerosol components from all data collected in 2001. Some results from IMPROVE special studies are also included. The was presented at the Science Colloquium on Measuring and modeling aerosols, June 14-16 in Baltimore, MD. Many of the figures of the particulate patterns can be found in the paper Malm et al., 2004, J. of Geo. Res. Vol 109, D03306Model NGN-2: Open-Air Integrating Nephelometer: Technical Manual for Theory of Operation and Operating ProceduresExpand
Authors: OPTEC, Inc.
Document
The Model NGN-2 (Next Generation Nephelometer) uses a unique integrating open-air design that allows accurate measurement of the scattering extinction coefficient of ambient air. Because of the open-air design, relative humidity and temperature of the air sample are essentially unchanged, thus the aerosol is negligibly modified when brought into the optical measuring chamber. With improvements made to the prototype NGN-1, the production Model NGN-2 nephelometer alters the temperature of the air sample by less than 0.5° C. Extinction due to scatter can accurately be measured from Rayleigh to 100% saturated fog conditions. Using principals and techniques developed for the popular and successful Optec LPV transmissometer, the NGN-2 features low power consumption, solid compact design, and easy operation – all necessary parameters when installing and operating a measuring instrument in remote locations. Housed in a single environmentally sealed enclosure, the nephelometer contains all the necessary components for ambient standalone operation. The NGN-2 consists of a large inlet with motorized door, measuring chamber, clean air pump for calibration, blower, solenoid activated inlet for a span gas, temperature sensor, real time clock and rain detector for closing the inlet during wet conditions. See Figure 1-2 for a cross-sectional view of the NGN-2. A CMOS computer controls all operating functions and outputs data either in digital or analog format. External to the NGN-2 unit, a 13.8V DC, 5 amp power supply, compressed span gas and a data logger or printer are required.Model LPV-2: Long Path Visibility Transmissometer: Technical Manual for Theory of Operation and Operating ProceduresExpand
Authors: OPTEC, Inc.
Document
The Model LPV-2 Long Path Visibility Transmissometer consists of a constant output light source transmitter and a computer controlled photometer receiver. The irradiance at 550nm wavelength from the transmitter can be measured to a high degree of accuracy both day and night, and over a path length of up to 15 km depending on expected extinction values. Both the receiver and transmitter operate from a 12 volt battery source and use 5 and 34 watts respectively. The signal is processed by an internal CMOS 8-bit computer and the output voltage can made proportional to extinction or visual range. The units can operate for long periods of time unattended in a continuous or timed cycle mode. The self resetting and battery backup systems ensure continued operation even after power blackouts and computer lockup due to local static electric discharges. Both units can be synchronized, programmed and calibrated at the home station and installed in the field ready for operation.The Major Components of PM2.5 at Remote Sites across the United StatesExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
This paper examines the annual and seasonal spatial patterns of the major aerosol components (sulfate, nitrate, organics, elemental carbon (EC), and soil) from the IMPROVE monitoring network. The data were from 70 monitoring sites with one year of data from March 1996 through February 1998.Methodology for Chemical Speciation Measurements in the IMPROVE NetworkExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
The IMPROVE (Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments) network collects PM2.5particles on Teflon, nylon, and quartz filters using a modular, cyclone-based sampler with critical orifice flow control. Understanding the protocols of IMPROVE is important because IMPROVE will continue to provide background monitoring at Class I areas, and because the protocols for measuring chemical species in the Federal Reference Method network at urban and suburban sites will probably be similar. The IMPROVE filters are analyzed by seven methods to obtain concentrations of mass, elements H and Na-Pb, ions NO3– and SO4=, organic and elemental carbon, and the coefficient of absorption. The replicate precision for most analytical methods is approximately 4%. The artifacts for all methods except carbon are small or zero. The artifact problem for organic carbon is minimized by allowing each filter to reach saturation prior to collection. Redundant measurements by the three filters permit improved quality control. Comparisons of sulfur with sulfate and organic carbon with organic hydrogen permit assurance that (1) the calculated uncertainties are reasonable, (2) the analytical methods are correctly calibrated, (3) the flow rates of the various modules are in agreement, and (4) the individual concentrations are valid.Sulfur-Sulfate History for IMPROVEExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
This report details the changes in the sampling and filter analysis in the IMPROVE program that could affect the fine particle sulfur or sulfate measurements. It was found that three issues could produce invalid data and the possible impact of these issue is examined using eastern US data.Sulfur-Sulfate Trends for IMPROVEExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
Warren White noted a trend in the ratio of nylon sulfate / Teflon sulfur over the course of the IMPROVE network. This is extremely critical in determining sulfate trends. This report concludes that there is no trend in the ratio of analytical calibrations, but there is a trend in the relationship at low concentrations. This is seen in the intercept and in distributions. The low end concentrations are primarily affected by the artifact that is subtracted from the samples. This change in low end concentrations can account for the trend in the ratios. No mechanism for producing such a change has been identified.Carbon Artifact on Version 2 IMPROVE SamplersExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
Significant changes were made in the IMPROVE cassettes in the new version of the sampler installed in the year 2000. The Version 2 cassette sampler are made of an inert plastic, Delrin®, and the filters sit on stainless steel screens. The Version 1 cassettes were polycarbonate and sat on cellulose drain discs over polycarbonate support grids. This report examines the change in the organic and elemental carbon artifact after the Version 2 cassettes were installed.Trends in EC/OC Ratio and Carbon FractionsExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
Long term trends in the EC/OC ratios in the IMPROVE network have been found. This report examines the question as to whether these trends are real or caused by analytical changes in the IMPROVE network. In addition, the appendix examines the seasonal variation and long term trends in the organic and elemental carbon artifacts.IMPROVE Critical Orifice Flow ControlExpand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Daviss
Document
The primary purpose of flow control is to keep the volume flow rate through the cyclone or PM10inlet as close as possible to the nominal rate for the 2.5 or 10 µm cut. There are several factors producing a variation in the flow rate for a critical orifice: the diurnal and seasonal variation of ambient temperature, the change in pressure drop across the filter associated with variation in clean filters, and the change in pressure drop across the filter associated with mass loading. The estimated total variation in inlet flow rate with a critical orifice controller from all three factors is generally less than 3%. This is similar to the standard deviation in flow rates observed in the network. The conclusion is that a critical orifice system is reasonable if a variation in flow rate of approximately 3% is acceptable.Saturation of the IMPROVE denuder for SO2 and HNO3Expand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
The IMPROVE denuder has a collection efficiency for SO2 of >99% when freshly coated. There is some question about whether there is breakthrough of SO2 and HNO3after being used for a year, at least at sites with high SO2 concentrations. This report examines the effect of breakthrough of SO2on the sulfate measurements and of HNO3 on the nitrate measurements.IMPROVE Completeness for Calendar Year 2001Expand
Authors: Eldred, B. – Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document
The primary purpose of flow control is to keep the volume flow rate through the cyclone or PM10inlet as close as possible to the nominal rate for the 2.5 or 10 µm cut. There are several factors producing a variation in the flow rate for a critical orifice: the diurnal and seasonal variation of ambient temperature, the change in pressure drop across the filter associated with variation in clean filters, and the change in pressure drop across the filter associated with mass loading. The estimated total variation in inlet flow rate with a critical orifice controller from all three factors is generally less than 3%. This is similar to the standard deviation in flow rates observed in the network. The conclusion is that a critical orifice system is reasonable if a variation in flow rate of approximately 3% is acceptable.Warnings on the Use of Transmissometer Data to Analyze Long-Term Visibility TrendsExpand
Authors: John Molenar – Air Resource Specialist
Document
Describes some of the limitations and issue concerning the transmissometer data and problems with using the long-term transmissometer records for trend analysis.Historic Comparison of Gravimetric and Reconstructed MassExpand
Authors: Eldred, B., UC Davis
Document
Reconstructed mass excluding nitrate is compared with gravimetric mass for each year of the IMPROVE network. Two parameters were used to investigate the trends. The first is the slope of the regression line through the origin, assuming gravimetric mass is independent. The second is the ratio of the two means. The slope emphasizes points with large mass, while the ratio reflects the average samples. No significant historical trends in the difference between the measured and reconstructed fine mass was found.Factor for Na in reconstructed massExpand
Authors: Eldred, B., UC Davis
Document
An Explanation as to why Na is multiplied by a factor of 2.5 to reconstructed sea salt.IMPROVE Particulate Monitoring Network Procedures for Site Selection **Expand
Authors: Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document **
In 1999 the IMPROVE network began to expand to monitor visibility in all Class I areas that visibility was deemed an important attribute of the Area. This document describes the procedure used to select the new IMPROVE monitoring sites.IMPROVE Data Guide – A Guide to Interpret Data **Expand
Authors: Crocker Nuclear Laboratory, UC Davis
Document **
A 1995 report providing an overview of the IMPROVE network. This document describes the IMPROVE monitors and filter analysis, estimation of uncertainty in the measures species, calculation of the major aerosol types and their uncertainty, as well as the effect of changing the analysis from PIXE to XRF for elements between Fe and Pb on the minimum detection limits and precision.National Park Service Special ImagesExpand
Authors: John Molenar – Air Resource Specialist
Document
A document containing images representing the cleanest and the haziest clear sky, non-weather, days found in the IMPROVE 35mm slide data base. Extinction coefficient estimates are also provided based upon the slide contrast measurements, the average species concentrations of the 20% lowest and highest fine mass days, and annual estimates of the f(rh).Uncertainty Analysis of Calculated Extinction From Apparent Contrast Measurements From Images of Natural TargetsExpand
Authors: John Molenar – Air Resource Specialist
Document
Examination and estimation of uncertainties in light extinction derived from apparent contrast measurements from images of natural targets.Summary of Limitations and Value of Slide-Based Visual Range MeasurementsExpand
Authors: Scott Copeland – CIRA
Document
This document summarize the limitations and value of light extinction and visual range measurements from slide based images.
09/2022
03/2022
12/2021
10/2021
01/2021
01/2018
01/2018
10/2017
09/2017
03/2013
02/2010
11/2008
08/2008
09/2007
04/2006
05/2007
03/2007
12/2006
10/2006
10/2006
10/2006
09/2006
08/2006
08/2006
06/2005
02/2006
01/2006
10/2005
6/13/2005
03/01/2006
7/1/1994
1/18/2005
1/24/2005
9/15/2004
7/14/2004
04/2006
3/1998
9/1997
2/1998
6/15/2001
5/17/2001
2/8/2002
10/26/2001
5/4/1998
5/7/1998
6/28/2002
12/14/2002
3/19/2001
3/8/2001
2/24/1999
8/1995
5/2001
044
043
042
041
040
039
038
037
036
035
034
033
032
031
030
029
028
027
026
025
024
023
022
021
020
020b
019
018
017
016
015
015b
014
013
013b
012
011
010
009
008
007
006
005
004
003
002
001
000